Chicago Cubs Message board contains the latest Cub news, rumors and events for discussion. The Cubs forum also holds the active game threads.
by l2uff on Feb 6th, 2012, 5:13 pm
mlbtr: Cubs Claim Adrian Cardenas By Ben Nicholson-Smith [February 6, 2012 at 4:02pm CST] The Cubs claimed Adrian Cardenas off of waivers from the Athletics, the A's announced. Oakland had designated the infielder for assignment on January 26th.
Cardenas, 24, spent the 2011 season with Oakland's Triple-A affiliate, where he posted a .314/.374/.418 line in 545 plate appearances and played left field, shortstop, second and third. In six minor league seasons, the 2006 draft pick has a .303/.368/.413 batting line.
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [February 6, 2012 at 4:06pm CST] The Cubs announced that they designated infielder Blake DeWitt for assignment. The move creates 40-man roster space for Adrian Cardenas, who the Cubs claimed from Oakland today.
-

l2uff
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5353
- Location: Orlando, FL
by l2uff on Feb 6th, 2012, 5:15 pm
I doubt DeWitt clears...
-

l2uff
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5353
- Location: Orlando, FL
by l2uff on Feb 6th, 2012, 5:17 pm
Kevin Goldstein @Kevin_Goldstein He can hit, but poor secondary skills, no defensive home. RT @A_Kuhn1: @Kevin_Goldstein what's Cardenas' hit tool now? Power?
Kevin Goldstein @Kevin_Goldstein Terrifying. RT @JoshHermanPJS: @Kevin_Goldstein So you're saying a Castro/Cardenas double-play combo could be ugly?
Kevin Goldstein @Kevin_Goldstein Darwin Barney shouldn't play every day, but he's a wonderful defender and 80 makeup guy. He'll still be in MLB when Cardenas is forgotten.
keithlaw @keithlaw Immaterial move. “@schultzmg: @keithlaw Cubs (more/less) swap Blake DeWitt for Adrian Cardenas...good move?”
-

l2uff
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5353
- Location: Orlando, FL
by BassmanUW on Feb 6th, 2012, 6:21 pm
I actually kinda bet that DeWitt will clear waivers ($1.1 million contract and a guy whose bat doesn't play at his only decent defensive position isn't worth very much), not that it really matters. They're both fringy guys without the bat to play 3B and the defense to play 2B.
-
BassmanUW
- Minor Leaguer
-
- Posts: 891
- Fan: Cubs
by sedgy145 on Feb 6th, 2012, 6:29 pm
If anything, the Cubs are rolling the dice and trying to shed $1M in payroll. For two fringe players who won't be starting, not a big risk on the Cubs' part.
Funny thing is, didn't the Cubs not want to give up DeWitt to Colorado for Stewart?
-

sedgy145
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5453
- Location: Chicago
- Fan: Cubs
by anotheridiot on Feb 7th, 2012, 11:10 am
not really, if he clears they probably give him a minor league split deal like they gave those pitchers, save a few hundred thousand if he makes the team. if he isnt picked up he would be better off joining hoff in japan.
I dont see much difference with Baker and Dewitt as far as the positions they play, but I dont expect baker around much anyway.
-
anotheridiot
- Minor Leaguer
-
- Posts: 941
- Location: Chicago IL
- Fan: Cubsbearshawksbulls
by The Stache on Feb 7th, 2012, 2:03 pm
Interesting. Wonder why the A's let him go. Hes progressed solidly through his minor league career and still only 24.
-

The Stache
- BrewersCubs.com Legend
-
- Posts: 21686
- Location: Palatine, IL
by tripxcore on Feb 7th, 2012, 6:02 pm
This guy has done nothing but hit everywhere he has been, it seems. I hope he can learn to play defense somewhere.
-

tripxcore
- Major Leaguer
-
- Posts: 3546
- Location: Las Vegas by way of Chicago
- Fan: Cubs, Blackhawks
-
by tripxcore on Feb 7th, 2012, 6:04 pm
Colin Wyers @cwyers
I find myself wondering if the Cubs think Cardenas is better than DeWitt or just cheaper.
-

tripxcore
- Major Leaguer
-
- Posts: 3546
- Location: Las Vegas by way of Chicago
- Fan: Cubs, Blackhawks
-
by l2uff on Feb 7th, 2012, 6:42 pm
BassmanUW wrote:I actually kinda bet that DeWitt will clear waivers ($1.1 million contract and a guy whose bat doesn't play at his only decent defensive position isn't worth very much), not that it really matters. They're both fringy guys without the bat to play 3B and the defense to play 2B.
correct me if I am wrong but DFA requires the Cubs to pass him through Irrevocable waivers (if they plan on sending him to a minor league team)... which means if any team claims him, they only owe him major league minimum (and the Cubs owe him the rest). The Cubs still have to pay DeWitt 1.1M even if he clears waivers and is sent to the minors. The Cubs can also release him, but they'd still owe him 1.1M.
-

l2uff
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5353
- Location: Orlando, FL
by BassmanUW on Feb 7th, 2012, 10:30 pm
l2uff wrote:BassmanUW wrote:I actually kinda bet that DeWitt will clear waivers ($1.1 million contract and a guy whose bat doesn't play at his only decent defensive position isn't worth very much), not that it really matters. They're both fringy guys without the bat to play 3B and the defense to play 2B.
correct me if I am wrong but DFA requires the Cubs to pass him through Irrevocable waivers (if they plan on sending him to a minor league team)... which means if any team claims him, they only owe him major league minimum (and the Cubs owe him the rest). The Cubs still have to pay DeWitt 1.1M even if he clears waivers and is sent to the minors. The Cubs can also release him, but they'd still owe him 1.1M.
I'd need to check the rules, but I think another team picking him up would mean they'd pick up his salary. If the Cubs released him they'd owe him the $1.1 million minus whatever another team signs him for. Again, I'd need to check, but that's my off the top of my head understanding.
-
BassmanUW
- Minor Leaguer
-
- Posts: 891
- Fan: Cubs
by l2uff on Feb 8th, 2012, 9:54 am
Designated for Assignment (MLB) When a club that has reached it 40 and /or 25 man roster limit, either reinstates a player, or acquires a new player (through a selection, a signing, a trade or a waiver claim); they must designate a player for assignment or release. If they are going to assign the player, they must do it within 10 days.[1] A player designated for assignment is removed from his club’s 40-man roster and, within the next 10 days, traded, released or, if he clears waivers, assigned to the minor leagues. A club may not designate a player for assignment if the corresponding transaction is to recall a player on optional assignment. [2] Post-designation
A player designated for assignment may be traded. A club interested in acquiring a player who has been designated for assignment may try to work out a trade before the player is placed on waivers, eliminating the possibility he might be claimed by a club with a higher waiver claim priority.[3] A player designated for assignment who clears waivers and is not traded may be released. The player then becomes a free agent.[4] A club wishing to send a player designated for assignment to the minor leagues must first place him on irrevocable outright waivers, making him available to the other 29 clubs in reverse order of won-lost record.[5] If the player is claimed, he is lost to the claiming team for $20,000. (Irrevocable waivers may not be reversed.) The claiming team pays the player the major-league minimum salary for the rest of the season, and the original club is responsible for the balance of his contract.[6] http://www.cbabaseball.com/rules/index. ... nment_(MLB)
-

l2uff
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5353
- Location: Orlando, FL
by BassmanUW on Feb 8th, 2012, 11:34 am
l2uff wrote:Designated for Assignment (MLB) When a club that has reached it 40 and /or 25 man roster limit, either reinstates a player, or acquires a new player (through a selection, a signing, a trade or a waiver claim); they must designate a player for assignment or release. If they are going to assign the player, they must do it within 10 days.[1] A player designated for assignment is removed from his club’s 40-man roster and, within the next 10 days, traded, released or, if he clears waivers, assigned to the minor leagues. A club may not designate a player for assignment if the corresponding transaction is to recall a player on optional assignment. [2] Post-designation
A player designated for assignment may be traded. A club interested in acquiring a player who has been designated for assignment may try to work out a trade before the player is placed on waivers, eliminating the possibility he might be claimed by a club with a higher waiver claim priority.[3] A player designated for assignment who clears waivers and is not traded may be released. The player then becomes a free agent.[4] A club wishing to send a player designated for assignment to the minor leagues must first place him on irrevocable outright waivers, making him available to the other 29 clubs in reverse order of won-lost record.[5] If the player is claimed, he is lost to the claiming team for $20,000. (Irrevocable waivers may not be reversed.) The claiming team pays the player the major-league minimum salary for the rest of the season, and the original club is responsible for the balance of his contract.[6] http://www.cbabaseball.com/rules/index. ... nment_(MLB)
Well there we go. Thanks for checking into that.
-
BassmanUW
- Minor Leaguer
-
- Posts: 891
- Fan: Cubs
by l2uff on Feb 18th, 2012, 9:51 am
DeWitt can become a FA, they were still waiting on that decision from him as of yesterday i think...
-

l2uff
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5353
- Location: Orlando, FL
by cubbiefan009 on Feb 18th, 2012, 10:39 am
l2uff wrote:DeWitt can become a FA, they were still waiting on that decision from him as of yesterday i think...
Yeah, DeWitt will either go into Free Agency or the Cubs will invite him as a non-roster to Spring Training.
-

cubbiefan009
- Hall of Famer
-
- Posts: 18931
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
- Fan: Cubs
by chiguy79 on Feb 18th, 2012, 5:15 pm
Honestly surprised he cleared waivers. I know he's no stud or anything but I figured someone would be willing to take a chance on him at league minimum.
-

chiguy79
- Major Leaguer
-
- Posts: 1662
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Fan: Cubs
by Old Style on Feb 20th, 2012, 12:22 pm
chiguy79 wrote:Honestly surprised he cleared waivers. I know he's no stud or anything but I figured someone would be willing to take a chance on him at league minimum.
I'm surprised too, he's still pretty young.
2011 BC.com Rookie of the Year "Just because a man wants to have sex with Derrick Rose, that doesn't make him gay." - some guy from RealGM
-

Old Style
- All-Star
-
- Posts: 5164
- Location: Algonquin, IL
- Fan: Cubs, Bulls, Bears
by The Stache on Feb 20th, 2012, 2:07 pm
Patrick Mooney @CSNMooney Blake DeWitt accepted assignment and will be in #Cubs camp as non-roster player.
-

The Stache
- BrewersCubs.com Legend
-
- Posts: 21686
- Location: Palatine, IL
by anotheridiot on Feb 20th, 2012, 3:03 pm
http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/po ... ll-competeTaking him on waivers would have forced the teams to pay his 1.1 million though wouldnt it have? best case he makes the team, worst case he goes to AAA and makes money. It would be interesting and I would consider it a win if he beats out Cardenas for the last utility job with a strong spring. DeWiTT can play third, first, second and a little left field. I doubt Baker returns to ripping the cover off the lefties and would rather have DeWitt in that role.
-
anotheridiot
- Minor Leaguer
-
- Posts: 941
- Location: Chicago IL
- Fan: Cubsbearshawksbulls
Return to Chicago Cubs
Users browsing this forum: gtriv420 and 1 guest
|